Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
[Cite as Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 86 Ohio St.3d 1207, 1999-Ohio-150.] AKRON HYDROELECTRIC COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as Akron Hydroelectric Co. v. Cuyahoga Falls (1999), 86 Ohio St.3d 1207.] Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 98-2122 Submitted June 9, 1999 Decided July 28, 1999.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Summit County, No. 18849. __________________ Richard K. Wilcox, for appellant. Virgil Arrington, Jr., Deputy Law Director, for appellee city of Cuyahoga Falls. Brouse & McDowell and J. Bruce Hunsicker, for appellee Powerhouse at Water s Edge, Ltd. __________________ This cause is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
