Strayer v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
1 STRAYER 2 APPELLANT. 3 [Cite as Strayer v. Federated Mut. Ins. Co. (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 4 Insurance -- Motor vehicles -- Pursuant to former R.C. 3937.18, an 5 underinsurance claim must be paid, when -- Determining amount of 6 underinsurance coverage to be paid. 7 8 9 10 ET AL., APPELLEES, V. FEDERATED MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, (Nos. 96-1125 and 96-1356 -- Submitted July 10, 1996 -- Decided August 7, 1996.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APE11-1507. _________ 11 12 Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott and Glen R. Pritchard, for appellees. 13 Hamilton, Kramer, Myers & Cheek, David W. Pryor and Stephen E. 14 15 16 17 18 Tugend, for appellant. _________ The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Cole v. Holland (1996), 76 Ohio St.3d ___, ___ N.E.2d. DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY and PFEIFER, JJ., concur. 1 MOYER, C.J., and COOK, J., dissent. 2 STRATTON, J., not participating. 3 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
