State v. Paxton

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

1 THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, V. PAXTON, APPELLEE. 2 [Cite as State v. Paxton (1996), ___ Ohio St.3d ___.] 3 Appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. 4 5 6 (No. 95-1340 -- Submitted September 24, 1996 -- Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No. L-93-227. _________ 7 8 9 10 11 Anthony G. Pizza, Lucas County Prosecuting Attorney, and J. Christopher Anderson, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Britz & Zemmelman and Norman G. Zemmelman; and John A. Coble, for appellee. _________ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 The appeal is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, KLINE, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and STRATTON, JJ., concur. ROGER L. KLINE, J., of the Fourth Appellate District, sitting for RESNICK, J. 1 2 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.