Horton v. Addy
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. Horton et al., Appellants, v. Addy et al., Appellees. [Cite as Horton v. Addy (1994), Ohio St.3d .] Appeal dismissed for want of final appealable order. (No. 93-592 -- Submitted March 30, 1994 -- Decided May 4, 1994.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 13524. E.S. Gallon & Associates and David M. Deutsch, for appellants. Freund, Freeze & Arnold, Patrick J. Janis and Fredric L. Young, for appellees. Wolske & Blue and Gerald S. Leeseberg, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers. Frost & Jacobs, Grant S. Cowan and Gregory A. Keyser, urgining affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys. Lang & Donoff, Marilyn R. Donoff and Paul W. Mills, urgining affirmance for amici curiae, Auto Club Insurance Company and Nevin Gross. The judgment of the court of appeals is vacated and the appeal is dismissed for want of a final appealable order. The cause is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
