State v. Henderson

 Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Whitten, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. The State of Ohio, Appellant and Cross-Appellee, v. Henderson, Appellee and Cross-Appellant. [Cite as State v. Henderson (1993), Ohio St.3d .] Appeal and cross-appeal dismissed as improvidently allowed. (No. 92-1004 -- Submitted April 6, 1993 -- Decided May 12, 1993.) Appeal and Cross-Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 58560. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Cuyahoga County Prosecuting Attorney, and George Rukovena, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant and cross-appellee. Hyman Friedman, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Beverly J. Pyle, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee and cross-appellant. The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed. A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents, and would affirm on the issue of murder, but would reverse on the issue of forgery and tampering with records.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.