State ex rel. Morales v. Cleveland
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
OPINIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO The full texts of the opinions of the Supreme Court of Ohio are being transmitted electronically beginning May 27, 1992, pursuant to a pilot project implemented by Chief Justice Thomas J. Moyer. Please call any errors to the attention of the Reporter's Office of the Supreme Court of Ohio. Attention: Walter S. Kobalka, Reporter, or Deborah J. Barrett, Administrative Assistant. Tel.: (614) 466-4961; in Ohio 1-800-826-9010. Your comments on this pilot project are also welcome. NOTE: Corrections may be made by the Supreme Court to the full texts of the opinions after they have been released electronically to the public. The reader is therefore advised to check the bound volumes of Ohio St.3d published by West Publishing Company for the final versions of these opinions. The advance sheets to Ohio St.3d will also contain the volume and page numbers where the opinions will be found in the bound volumes of the Ohio Official Reports. The State ex rel. Morales, Appellee, v. City of Cleveland et al., Appellants. [Cite as State ex rel. Morales v. Cleveland (1993), Ohio St. 3d .] Mandamus to compel release of public records relating to relator's convictions for kidnapping and aggravated murder -- Writ granted when witness statements not exempt as "trial preparation records" under R.C. 149.43(A)(4). (No. 93-268 -- Submitted September 14, 1993 -- Decided November 10, 1993.) Appeal from the Court of Appeals for Cuyahoga County, No. 62165. In 1985, a jury convicted relator-appellee Alfred Morales of kidnapping and murdering Mario Trevino. The jury recommended the death penalty, and the trial judge sentenced Morales to death. We upheld the convictions and death sentence. State v. Morales (1987), 32 Ohio St.3d 252, 513 N.E.2d 267, certiorari denied, Morales v. Ohio (1988), 484 U.S. 1047, 108 S.Ct. 785, 98 L.Ed.2d 871. In June 1991, Morales's counsel requested that Cleveland officials release public records relating to the offenses for which Morales had been convicted and sentenced. Before the city released the records, Morales petitioned the court of appeals for a writ of mandamus under R.C. 149.43 against respondents-appellants, the city of Cleveland and Cleveland's mayor, police chief, and director of public safety (the "city"). The city then released one hundred and fifty-five documents, some with redactions, and claimed thirteen documents were totally exempt from release. After an in camera review, the court of appeals, inter alia, held that five witness statements were not exempt trial preparation documents as the city claimed. The city now appeals the decision of the court of appeals as a matter of right. James Kura, Ohio Public Defender, Dale A. Baich and Kathleen A. McGarry, Assistant Public Defenders, for appellee. Danny R. Williams, Director of Law, and Pamela A. Pfleger Walker, Assistant Director of Law, for appellants. Per Curiam. The court of appeals did not abuse its discretion in finding these particular witness statements not exempt as trial preparation records. See State ex rel. Williams v. Cleveland (1992), 64 Ohio St.3d 544, 597 N.E.2d 147; State ex rel. Coleman v. Cincinnati (1991), 57 Ohio St.3d 83, 566 N.E.2d 151. Accordingly, the judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed. Judgment affirmed. Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
