State v. Doglod

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT AUGUST 18, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2022 ND 162 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Naike Doglod, Defendant and Appellant No. 20220035 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable David E. Reich, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Julie A. Lawyer, State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Doglod No. 20220035 Per Curiam. [¶1] Naike Doglod appeals a criminal judgment entered after a jury found her guilty of terrorizing and criminal trespass. She argues the evidence was insufficient to sustain her convictions. After reviewing the record, sufficient evidence supports Doglod’s terrorizing and criminal trespass convictions. See State v. Johnson, 2021 ND 161, ¶ 14, 964 N.W.2d 500 (“We have reviewed the evidence in a light favorable to the verdict, considered the reasonable inferences the jury could draw from the evidence, and conclude substantial evidence was presented to the jury to warrant a conviction.”). We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.