Matter of Didier

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT FEBRUARY 3, 2021 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2021 ND 13 In the Matter of Lawrence Didier Frederick Fremgen, Stutsman County State’s Attorney, Petitioner and Appellee v. Lawrence Didier, Respondent and Appellant No. 20200217 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Cherie L. Clark, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Joseph K. Nwoga, Assistant State’s Attorney, Jamestown, ND, for petitioner and appellee. Tyler J. Morrow, Grand Forks, ND, for respondent and appellant. Matter of Didier No. 20200217 Per Curiam. [¶1] Lawrence Didier appeals from a district court order denying his petition for discharge from civil commitment. Didier argues the order denying his discharge from civil commitment was not supported by clear and convincing evidence he remains a sexually dangerous individual. Under our modified clearly erroneous standard of review, we conclude the district court’s findings of fact and order are supported by clear and convincing evidence. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.