Beyer v. State
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
Filed 10/21/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 210 Dalton Donald Beyer, Petitioner and Appellant v. State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee No. 20200052 Appeal from the District Court of Dunn County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Rhonda R. Ehlis, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Kyle R. Craig, Minot, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief. Stephenie L. Davis, State’s Attorney, Manning, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief. Beyer v. State No. 20200052 Per Curiam. [¶1] Dalton Beyer appeals from an order denying post-conviction relief. Beyer argues the district court erred by denying his application for postconviction relief seeking to withdraw his guilty plea. Beyer argues his plea was not voluntary due to the combined effects of psychiatric medications and withdrawal from hormone therapy. The district court found that Beyer was capable of making knowing, intelligent, and voluntary decisions at the time he entered his plea, and the plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made. The court did not err in denying Beyer’s application for post-conviction relief and we summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Gerald W. VandeWalle Jerod E. Tufte 1
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
