State v. Lindquist

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

Filed 07/22/2020 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 163 State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Ryan Michael Lindquist, Defendant and Appellant No. 20200022 Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia Feland, Judge. AFFIRMED. Per Curiam. Ladd R. Erickson, State’s Attorney, Washburn, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief. Russell J. Myhre, Enderlin, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Lindquist No. 20200022 Per Curiam. [¶1] Ryan Lindquist appeals from a criminal judgment after entering conditional pleas following an order denying his motion to suppress. On appeal, Lindquist states his “main contention upon [his] motion to suppress was that because Lindquist was immediately detained at the scene . . . [his] detention was violative of Lindquist’s Fourth Amendment rights.” While Lindquist makes a conclusory statement that his detention was unlawful, he failed to adequately develop an argument in support of this contention. The district court’s findings have adequate support in the record. “Our Court will not consider an argument that is not adequately articulated, supported, and briefed.” State v. Bachmeier, 2007 ND 42, ¶ 10, 729 N.W.2d 141. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2),(7). [¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Lisa Fair McEvers Daniel J. Crothers Jerod E. Tufte Gerald W. VandeWalle 1

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.