Odom v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 163 Order denying petitioner's application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 163

Charles Bradford Odom, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20180089

Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Bobbi L. Weiler, Bismarck, ND, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Julie A. Lawyer, Assistant State's Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Odom v. StateNo. 20180089

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Charles Bradford Odom appealed from a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Odom argues the district court erred in denying his application because the recently amended N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-23(1)(a)(2) is a change in substantive law that should be applied retrospectively in the interest of justice. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(7), see State v. Iverson, 2006 ND 193, ¶ 8, 721 N.W.2d 396 (holding a statute lessening punishment may not be applied retroactively to final convictions because it would constitute an invalid exercise by the Legislature of the executive pardoning power).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.