State v. Tucker
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 4 Criminal judgment for robbery is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2018 ND 4
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
David Ryan Tucker, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20170278
Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald Hager, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Andrew C. Eyre (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, and Jenna Bergman (on brief), third-year law student, under the Rule on Limited Practice of Law by Law Students, Grand Forks, ND, for plaintiff and appellee.
Kiara C. Kraus-Parr (argued), Grand Forks, ND, for defendant and appellant.
State v. TuckerNo. 20170278
Per Curiam.
[¶1] David Tucker appeals a criminal judgment entered after a bench trial finding him guilty of robbery, a class B felony. On appeal, Tucker argues the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jon J. Jensen
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.