State v. Raphael

Annotate this Case

Court Description: 131 Criminal judgment for possession of a controlled substance is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 131

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Roxanne Racquel Raphael, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20160447

Appeal from the District Court of Sheridan County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable James S. Hill, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd R. Erickson, State's Attorney, Washburn, N.D., for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.

State v. RaphaelNo. 20160447

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Roxanne Raphael appeals a district court judgment after a jury convicted her of possession of a controlled substance. Raphael argues the jury's verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Jerod E. Tufte
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.