State v. Howe
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: 90 Conviction on two counts of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2017 ND 90
State of North
Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Richard Scott Howe, Defendant and
Appellant
No. 20160331
Appeal from the District Court of Adams
County, Southwest Judicial District, the Honorable Rhonda Rae
Ehlis, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Aaron W. Roseland, P.O. Box 390, Hettinger, ND 58639,
for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C.
Ringsak, 103 S. Third St., Ste. 6, Bismarck, ND 58501, for defendant and appellant;
submitted on brief.
State v. HoweNo. 20160331
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Richard Howe appeals a district court's judgment after a jury convicted him on two counts of possession of a controlled substance and two counts of possession of drug paraphernalia. Howe argues the guilty verdict is not supported by sufficient evidence. We conclude sufficient evidence supports the verdict. We summarily affirm the criminal judgment under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W.
VandeWalle, C.J.
Lisa Fair McEvers
Daniel J. Crothers
Jerod E. Tufte
Carol
Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.