Parizek v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Order denying an application for postconviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2015 ND 87

Ronald Eugene Parizek, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20140356

Appeal from the District Court of Ward County, North Central Judicial District, the Honorable Richard L. Hagar, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Mark T. Blumer, Assistant City Attorney, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, N.D. 58106, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Christene A. Reierson, Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 5005, Minot, N.D. 58702-5005, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Parizek v. StateNo. 20140356

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Ronald Eugene Parizek, Sr. appeals from a district court order denying his application for postconviction relief. Parizek pled guilty to and was convicted of three counts of delivery of marijuana, class B felonies, and driving under suspension, a class B misdemeanor. Parizek applied for postconviction relief, arguing he had received ineffective assistance of counsel. The district court held an evidentiary hearing and denied his application. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2), concluding the district court's findings of fact are not clearly erroneous and the court did not err in determining Parizek failed to establish ineffective assistance of counsel.

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers
Lisa Fair McEvers
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.