Interest of H.D.
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Continuing treatment order and involuntary treatment with medication order summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 206
In the Interest of H.D.
William Pryatel, M.D., Petitioner and Appellee
v.
H.D., Respondent and Appellant
No. 20130320
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Steven E. McCullough, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Gary E. Euren, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for petitioner and appellee.
Douglas W. Nesheim, 15 Ninth Street South, Fargo, N.D. 58103-1830, for respondent and appellant.
Interest of H.D.No. 20130320
Per Curiam.
[¶1] H.D. appeals a district court's continuing treatment order and involuntary treatment with medication order. He argues there is insufficient evidence to support the involuntary treatment order and claims there is no clear and convincing evidence showing he requires a higher dosage of medication. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.