State v. Moran
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Criminal judgment for possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana paraphernalia is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 165
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Frankie Manuel Moran, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20130061
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Christine H. McAllister, Burleigh County Assistant State's Attorney, 514 E. Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for plaintiff and appellee; on brief.
Kent M. Morrow, 411 N. 4th Street, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for defendant and appellant; on brief.
State v. MoranNo. 20130061
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Frankie Moran appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury found him guilty of possession of marijuana with intent to deliver and possession of marijuana paraphernalia and not guilty of possession of alprazolam without a prescription. On appeal, Moran argues the verdicts are legally inconsistent and insufficient evidence exists to support the guilty verdicts. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.