Pederson v. State

Annotate this Case

Court Description: Judgment denying application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).



IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2013 ND 7

Tate Allister Pederson, Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20120331

Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Wickham Corwin, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Bobbi B. Weiler, 418 East Rosser Avenue, Suite 320, Bismarck, N.D. 58501, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.
Reid A. Brady and Tanya J. Martinez, Assistant State's Attorneys, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Pederson v. StateNo. 20120331

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Tate Pederson appeals from a district court judgment denying his application for post-conviction relief. Pederson argues that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.