Waslaski v. State
Annotate this CaseCourt Description: Order summarily dismissing application for post-conviction relief is summarily affirmed under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7).
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2012 ND 232
Edward Waslaski Jr., Petitioner and Appellant
v.
State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee
Nos. 20120291, 20120292 & 20120293
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Douglas R. Herman, Judge. AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Benjamin C. Pulkrabek (on brief), 402 1st St. NW, Mandan, N.D. 58554-3118, for petitioner and appellant.
Leah J. Viste (on brief), Assistant State's Attorney, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for respondent and appellee.
Waslaski v. StateNos. 20120291-20120293
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Edward Waslaski, Jr., appealed from a trial court order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. On appeal, Waslaski argues he received ineffective assistance of counsel and the trial court failed to advise him of his rights under N.D.R.Crim.P. 11(b).
[¶2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6) and (7); see Ude v. State, 2009 ND 71, ¶ 12, 764 N.W.2d 419 (stating a petitioner is not entitled to an evidentiary hearing on his application for post-conviction relief if he fails to provide any competent evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
Daniel J. Crothers
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.