State v. Rohde

Annotate this Case

State v. Rohde, 2002 ND 169, 655 N.W.2d 84

Filed Nov. 5, 2002
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2002 ND 169

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Kevin E. Rohde, Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20020029-32

City of Valley City, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Kevin E. Rohde, Defendant and Appellant

No. 20020033

Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable John T. Paulson, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Kevin E. Rohde (argued), pro se, North Dakota State Penitentiary, P.O. Box 5521, Bismarck, N.D. 58506-5521.
Robin Huseby, State's Attorney, 230 4th Street NW, Rm. 301, Valley City, N.D. 58072; submitted on brief.

State v. Rohde
Nos. 20020029-33

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Kevin Rohde appeals from convictions for driving under suspension or revocation, driving without liability insurance, and driving while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Rohde primarily argues he was exercising his constitutional right to operate a motor vehicle on the roads of North Dakota without a valid North Dakota driver's license. This argument has been presented before, and we again reject it. City of Valley City v. Stuart, 1999 ND 210, ¶ 1, 606 N.W.2d 137; City of Bismarck v. Stuart, 546 N.W.2d 366, 367 (N.D. 1996); State v. Stuart, 544 N.W.2d 158, 163 (N.D. 1996); State v. Kouba, 319 N.W.2d 161, 163 (N.D. 1982). All other arguments presented are frivolous, as well. We summarily affirm the trial court's judgments under Rule 35.1(a)(1), N.D.R.App.P.

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
Mary Muehlen Maring

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.