Eide v. Eide
Annotate this CaseEide v. Eide, 2002 ND 94, 647 N.W.2d 706
[Go to Documents]Filed June 4, 2002[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2002 ND 94
Janice Eide, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Ingvald Eugene Eide III, Defendant and Appellee
No. 20010236
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Bruce A. Romanick, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Richard B. Baer (submitted on brief), Richard B. Baer, P.C., 1110 College Drive, Suite 211, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-1225, for plaintiff and appellant.
Rauleigh D. Robinson (submitted on brief), 3379 97th Avenue NE, Suite 1, Bismarck, N.D. 58503, for defendant and appellee.
Eide v. Eide
No. 20010236
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Janice Eide appeals from the trial court's order denying her N.D.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion for relief from a judgment which granted her a divorce from Ingvald Eugene Eide III and distributed the parties' property. On appeal, she argues the property she has received from her former husband is not the property she bargained for when she entered into the separation agreement that was incorporated into the divorce judgment. We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion and affirm the trial court's order under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Mary Muehlen Maring
William A. Neumann
Dale V. Sandstrom
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.