State v. Marshall

State v. Marshall, 2002 ND 3, 642 N.W.2d 532

[Go to Documents]Filed Jan. 15, 2002[Download as WordPerfect]IN THE SUPREME COURTSTATE OF NORTH DAKOTA2002 ND 3

State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Floyd Solomon Marshall, Sr., Defendant and Appellant

Nos. 20010193 & 20010253

Appeals from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Norman J. Backes, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Jennifer L. Thompson, Assistant State's Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, ND 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
Floyd Solomon Marshall, Sr., pro se, James River Correctional Center, 2521 Circle Drive, Reg. 16984, Jamestown, ND 58401-6904, for defendant and appellant.

State v. Marshall
Nos. 20010193 & 20010253

Per Curiam.

[¶1] Floyd Solomon Marshall, Sr., appeals from the district court's orders denying his N.D.R.Crim.P. 35(a) motion for correction of his sentence and his N.D.R.Crim.P. 36 motion for correction of a clerical mistake in his sentence. Marshall briefed issues already decided by this Court. See State v. Marshall, 1999 ND 242, ¶ 7, 603 N.W.2d 878 (holding Marshall qualifies as a dangerous special offender). At oral argument, Marshall presented arguments not briefed. With neither citations to relevant authority, nor any supportive reasoning to buttress his claim of sentence correction, Marshall's arguments are without merit. See Friedt v. Moseanko, 484 N.W.2d 861, 863 (N.D. 1992). We conclude Marshall's appeals are frivolous and completely without merit. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(1).

[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring