Towne v. Dinius
Annotate this CaseTowne v. Dinius, 1998 ND 162, 590 N.W.2d 230
Filed Sep. 15, 1998
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
1998 ND 162Anthony Towne, Plaintiff and Appellant
v.
Marilyn M. Dinius, Defendant and Appellee
Civil No. 980092
Appeal from the District Court for Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam
Anthony Towne, pro se, P.O. Box 735, Bismarck, N.D. 58502, plaintiff and appellant.
Patricia E. Garrity of Bair, Bair & Garrity, 210 First Avenue N.W., P.O. Box 100, Mandan, N.D. 58554, for defendant and appellee.
Towne v. Dinius
Civil No. 980092
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Anthony Towne appeals a judgment entered as a matter of law under N.D.R.Civ.P. 50(a), arguing there was "legally sufficient evidence" to send the matter to trial. We hold there is no "legally sufficient evidentiary basis" on the record to support such a claim. Therefore, we affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(6).
[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Herbert L. Meschke
Dale V. Sandstrom
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.