McCaskill v. Dept. of State Treasurer
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 292A10 FILED: 11 MARCH 2011 DONALD C. MCCASKILL, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF STATE TREASURER, RETIREMENT SYSTEMS DIVISION, Respondent Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. ' 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 695 S.E.2d 108 (2010), affirming an order entered on 23 February 2009 by Judge Orlando F. Hudson, Jr. in Superior Court, Durham County. On 7 October 2010, the Supreme Court allowed petitioner=s petition for discretionary review of additional issues. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 January 2011. Stark Law Group, PLLC, by Thomas H. Stark and Seth A. Neyhart, for petitioner-appellant. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Robert M. Curran, Special Deputy Attorney General, for respondent-appellee. PER CURIAM. As to the issues before us on appeal of right, because the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services lacked authority to sign the settlement agreement binding the State Retirement System, the executory portions of the agreement are unenforceable. Accordingly, the parties to the agreement are otherwise restored to the positions they held as of 3 July 2002. As to the additional issue, we determine that discretionary review was improvidently allowed. AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. Justice JACKSON took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
