Munger v. State

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF NORTH CAROLINA No. 130PA10 FILED: 3 FEBRUARY 2011 MICHAEL C. MUNGER, BARBARA HOWE, and MARK WHITELEY CARES v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA; JAMES T. FAIN, III, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Commerce, in his official capacity; REGINALD HINTON, Acting Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Revenue, in his official capacity; DAVID T. MCCOY, State Budget Officer for the Office of State Budget and Management, in his official capacity; MICHAEL F. EASLEY, Governor of the State of North Carolina, in his official capacity; GOOGLE INC.; and MADRAS INTEGRATION, LLC On discretionary review pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-31 of a unanimous decision of the Court of Appeals, ___ N.C. App. ___, 689 S.E.2d 230 (2010), affirming an order dismissing all claims for relief filed by plaintiffs entered on 14 November 2008 by Judge Paul C. Ridgeway in Superior Court, Wake County. Heard in the Supreme Court 11 January 2011. Robert F. Orr and Jeanette K. Doran for plaintiffappellants. Roy Cooper, Attorney General, by Norma S. Harrell, Special Deputy Attorney General, for defendantappellees State of North Carolina, James T. Fain, III, Reginald Hinton, David T. McCoy, and Michael F. Easley. Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, PLLC, by Burley B. Mitchell, Jr. and Pressly M. Millen, for defendantappellees Google Inc. and Madras Integration, LLC. Troutman Sanders LLP, by William G. Scoggin, for North Carolina Economic Developers Association and the N.C. Chamber, amici curiae. PER CURIAM. -2- DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED. Justice JACKSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.