Privette v. Clemmons
Annotate this Case145 S.E.2d 13 (1965)
265 N.C. 727
William A. PRIVETTE v. Harold Bryon CLEMMONS and Ida M. Clemmons.
No. 701.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
December 1, 1965.
*14 Sullivan & Horne, Southport, for plaintiff.
James, James & Crossley, Wilmington, for defendants.
PER CURIAM.
The motion for nonsuit was properly allowed. The evidence utterly fails to support the specifications of negligence set out in the complaint. And there is no showing that the accident was caused by any negligence of defendants. See Fuller v. Fuller, 253 N.C. 288, 116 S.E.2d 776; Ivey v. Rollins, 250 N.C. 89, 108 S.E.2d 63.
Affirmed.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
