Edmisten v. Edmisten

Annotate this Case

144 S.E.2d 404 (1965)

265 N.C. 488

J. H. EDMISTEN v. Margaret Q. EDMISTEN.

No. 366.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

October 20, 1965.

*405 Louis H. Smith, Boone, for defendant appellant.

Holshouser & Holshouser, Boone, for plaintiff appellee.

PER CURIAM:

From and after the execution of a valid deed of separation, a husband and wife living apart, do so by mutual consent. The prior misconduct of one will not defeat his action for divorce under G.S. ยง 50-6, brought two years thereafter. Plaintiff's demurrer to defendant's further answer was properly sustained. The judgment is affirmed upon the authority of Jones v. Jones, 261 N.C. 612, 135 S.E.2d 554; Richardson v. Richardson, 257 N.C. 705, 127 S.E.2d 525.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.