McRavion v. N.C. Dep't Of Corr

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. NO. COA13-467 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 19 November 2013 JOSHUA G. MCRAVION, Plaintiff, v. North Carolina Industrial Commission I.C. No. TA-21976 N.C. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, Defendant. Appeal December by 2012 plaintiff by the from North Decision Carolina and Order Industrial entered 21 Commission. Heard in the Court of Appeals 5 November 2013. Attorney General Roy A. Cooper, III, by Associate Attorney General Adrian W. Dellinger, for defendant appellee. Joshua G. McRavion, pro se. STROUD, Judge. Plaintiff appeals from a Decision and Order entered by the North Carolina Industrial Commission awarding him $150.00. Plaintiff s entire brief challenging the award of $150.00 is approximately half a page long. Plaintiff does not raise a single legal issue in this half-page brief nor does he cite any law. It is not the role of the appellate courts to create an -2appeal for the appellant. N.C. App. 45, 48, 627 Abbott v. N.C. Bd. of Nursing, 177 S.E.2d 482, quotation marks, and ellipses omitted). AFFIRMED. Judges CALABRIA and STEELMAN concur. Report per Rule 30(e) 484 (2006) (citation,

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.