In the Matter of: S.C.S
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
An unpublished opinion of the North Carolina Court of Appeals does not constitute controlling legal authority. Citation is disfavored, but may be permitted in accordance with the provisions of Rule 30(e)(3) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. NO. COA04-12 NORTH CAROLINA COURT OF APPEALS Filed: 19 October 2004 IN THE MATTER OF: Alamance County No. 03 J 58 S.C.S. Appeal by respondent-mother from an adjudication and dispositional order signed 8 July 2003 by Judge Bradley R. Allen, Sr. in Alamance County District Court. Heard in the Court of Appeals 18 October 2004. Jamie L. Hamlett for Alamance County Department of Social Services, petitioner-appellee. Susan J. Hall for respondent-appellant. Robert Collins, Guardian Ad Litem. LEVINSON, Judge. Respondent-mother appeals from an order adjudicating her son S.C.S. neglected. For the reasons stated herein, we affirm. SCS was born on 28 September 2001 to respondent-mother and B.H.S., Jr. (father). Department of Social On 3 March 2003, the Alamance County Services (petitioner) filed a petition alleging that S.C.S. was a neglected juvenile. The affidavit as to the status of the minor child was attached to the petition, but was not completed or signed. After a hearing, the trial court adjudicated S.C.S. neglected and ordered that custody of S.C.S. be -2with petitioner for placement in foster care. Respondent-mother appeals. By her sole assignment of error brought forward on appeal, respondent-mother contends the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction over the case because petitioner failed to file an affidavit required by N.C.G.S. § 50A-209. We disagree. Section 50A-209(a) requires each party in a child custody proceeding in its first pleading or in an attached affidavit to give information as to the child's present address or whereabouts and where the child has resided within the previous five years. N.C.G.S. § 50A-209(a) (2003). The purpose of the information is to assist the trial court in determining whether it has jurisdiction. In re Clark, 159 N.C. App. 75, 79, 582 S.E.2d 657, 660 (2003). This Court stated in Clark that [a]lthough it remains the better practice to require compliance with section 50A-209, failure to file this affidavit does not, by itself, divest the trial court of jurisdiction. Id. Moreover, the Official Comment to section 50A209 states that failure to provide the information does not deprive the court of jurisdiction to hear the case. 50A-209 official commentary (2003). had jurisdiction to hear the Accordingly, the trial court case and respondent-mother s assignment of error is overruled. Affirmed. Judges TIMMONS-GOODSON and CALABRIA concur. Report per Rule 30(e). N.C.G.S. §
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
