Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc. v Dal Piaz
Annotate this Case
Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc. v Dal Piaz
2014 NY Slip Op 01104
Decided on February 18, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on February 18, 2014
No. 90 SSM 2
[*1]In the Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc., Respondent,
v
Christopher Dal Piaz, et al., Appellants.
Submitted by Ahmed A. Massoud, for appellants.
Submitted by Edward S. Feldman, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division correctly determined that vacatur of the arbitration award would require an impermissible fact-intensive review by the courts. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam concur. Judge Rivera took no part.
Decided February 18, 2014
Decided on February 18, 2014
No. 90 SSM 2
[*1]In the Matter of McIver-Morgan, Inc., Respondent,
v
Christopher Dal Piaz, et al., Appellants.
Submitted by Ahmed A. Massoud, for appellants.
Submitted by Edward S. Feldman, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question not answered upon the ground that it is unnecessary. The Appellate Division correctly determined that vacatur of the arbitration award would require an impermissible fact-intensive review by the courts. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Abdus-Salaam concur. Judge Rivera took no part.
Decided February 18, 2014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
