York v York
Annotate this Case
York v York
2014 NY Slip Op 00178
Decided on January 14, 2014
Court of Appeals
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.
Decided on January 14, 2014
No. 61 SSM 39
[*1]Esther York, Appellant,
v
Joseph York, Respondent.
Submitted by Richard A. Greenberg, for appellant.
Submitted by Franklyn H. Snitow, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The order below was not an abuse of discretion. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided January 14, 2014
Decided on January 14, 2014
No. 61 SSM 39
[*1]Esther York, Appellant,
v
Joseph York, Respondent.
Submitted by Richard A. Greenberg, for appellant.
Submitted by Franklyn H. Snitow, for respondent.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative. The order below was not an abuse of discretion. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided January 14, 2014
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
