Matter of Candino v Starpoint Cent. School Dist.

Matter of Candino v Starpoint Cent. School Dist. 2014 NY Slip Op 06016 Decided on September 4, 2014 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on September 4, 2014
No. 214 SSM 17

[*1]Matter of Joseph D. Candino, Jr., Appellant,

v

Starpoint Central School District, et al., Respondents.

Submitted by John A. Collins, for appellant.

Submitted by Louis B. Dingeldey, Jr., for respondents Starpoint Central School District et al.

Submitted by Jenna W. Klucsik, for respondents Iroquois Central School District et al.

Submitted by Jeremy A. Colby, for respondents West Seneca Central School District et al.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order affirmed, with costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in denying claimant's application to file and serve a late notice of claim (see General Municipal Law § 50-e [5]; Williams v Nassau County Med. Ctr., 6 NY3d 531 [2006]).

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.

Decided September 4, 2014