Matter of Lacorte v Cytryn

Annotate this Case
Matter of Lacorte v Cytryn 2013 NY Slip Op 05709 Decided on August 22, 2013 Court of Appeals Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law ยง 431. This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on August 22, 2013
No. 240

[*1]In the Matter of Dagan Lacorte, Appellant,

v

Howard L. Cytryn, et al., Respondents, et al., Respondent. (And Another Proceeding.)




Jerry H. Goldfeder, for appellant.
Alan Goldston, for respondents Cytryn, et al.
Thomas M. Mascola, for respondent Rockland County
Board of Elections.


MEMORANDUM:

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.

The Appellate Division properly determined that the validating petition did not sufficiently specify which determinations of the board petitioner claimed were erroneous (see Matter of Krueger v Richards, 59 NY2d 680, 682 [1983]).
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Order affirmed, without costs, in a memorandum. Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott, Rivera and Abdus-Salaam concur.
Decided August 22, 2013



Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.