People v Mingo
Annotate this Case[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
John Mingo, Appellant.
Decided October 16, 2007
People v Mingo, 37 AD3d 854, affirmed.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Appellate Advocates, New York City (Lynn W.L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.
Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York City (Fay Ng of counsel), for respondent.
{**9 NY3d at 938} OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed. The Appellate Division, having affirmed without opinion, may have done so on the basis that the sentence imposed was not excessive, an issue beyond this Court's review.
Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. .
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.