People v Shaban Celaj
Annotate this Case[*1] The People of the State of New York, Respondent,
v
Shaban Celaj, Appellant.
Decided January 12, 2004
People v Celaj, 306 AD2d 71, affirmed.
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Steven R. Kartagener, New York City, for appellant.
Robert T. Johnson, District Attorney, Bronx (Yael V. Levy of counsel), for respondent.
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. The determination of reasonable suspicion made by Supreme Court and affirmed by the Appellate Division involves a mixed question of law and fact which is supported by evidence in the record. Consequently, the issue is beyond further review by this Court.
Chief Judge Kaye and Judges G.B. Smith, Ciparick, Rosenblatt, Graffeo and Read concur.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.4), order affirmed, in a memorandum.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.