Piro v. Public Service Electric and Gas Co.

Annotate this Case

53 N.J. 7 (1968)

247 A.2d 667

SALVATORE PIRO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued November 6, 1968.

Decided November 25, 1968.

Mr. Geoffrey Gaulkin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Beggans and Keale, attorneys).

Mr. Arthur N. D'Italia argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Warren, Chasan, Leyner & Holland, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the per curiam opinion in the Appellate Division, 103 N.J. Super. 456.

For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN 7.

For reversal None.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.