Ellis v. Caprice
Annotate this Case50 N.J. 409 (1967)
HOWARD ELLIS, ADMR., ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER, v. ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS. PATRICIA ELLIS, INFANT, ETC., PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, CROSS-PETITIONER, v. ROSE CAPRICE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-PETITIONERS, CROSS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
November 14, 1967.
Messrs. Harkavy & Lieb, for the defendants-petitioners, cross-respondents.
Messrs. Baker, Garber, Chazen & Duffy, and Mr. Irving J. Rosenberg for the plaintiffs-respondents, cross-petitioners.
Denied.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
