IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION OF THE MONROE TOWNSHIP HOUSING ELEMENT AND FAIR SHARE PLAN AND IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCES

Annotate this Case

 
(NOTE: The status of this decision is Published.)

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE

APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY

APPELLATE DIVISION

DOCKET NO. A-0

APPROVED FOR PUBLICATION


 

November 25, 2015


 

APPELLATE DIVISION

 

IN THE MATTER OF THE ADOPTION

OF THE MONROE TOWNSHIP HOUSING

ELEMENT AND FAIR SHARE PLAN

AND IMPLEMENTING ORDINANCES

_____________________________________________________

November 25, 2015

 

Submitted November 17, 2015 Decided

Before Judges Fisher, Espinosa and Rothstadt.

On appeal from the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Middlesex County, Docket No. L-3365-15, reported at ___ N.J. Super. ___ (Law Div. 2015).

John J. Hoffman, Acting Attorney General, attorney for appellant Department of Community Affairs (Robert T. Lougy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Geraldine Callahan, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Jerome J. Convery and Shain, Schaffer & Rafanello, P.C., attorneys for respondent Township of Monroe (Mr. Convery and Marguerite M. Schaffer, of counsel; Ms. Schaffer and Jose Rivera-Benitez, on the brief).

Fair Share Housing Center, attorneys for respondent Fair Share Housing Center (Kevin D. Walsh, on the brief).

PER CURIAM

In the wake of In re N.J.A.C. 5:96 & 5:97, 221 N.J. 1 (2015), and In re Failure of the Council on Affordable Housing To Adopt Trust Fund Commitment Regulations, 440 N.J. Super. 220 (App. Div. 2015), the trial court denied the motion of the Department of Community Affairs to intervene in this action, which was commenced by the Township of Monroe for a judgment declaring its housing plan presumptively valid. The DCA sought to file a counterclaim seeking an accounting and turnover of Monroe's affordable housing trust funds based on an allegation that Monroe failed "to spend or commit to spend" the funds in the time prescribed by N.J.S.A. 52:27D-329.2(d) and -329.3(b).

We granted leave to appeal and now affirm substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Douglas K. Wolfson's well-reasoned and comprehensive written opinion reported at __ N.J. Super. __ (Law Div. 2015).

Affirmed.


 

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.