NATHAN R. SCHNITZER VS RUDOLPH F. RINDERER, JR. & ET ALS

(NOTE: This decision was approved by the court for publication.)
This case can also be found at 318 N.J. Super. 322, 723 A.2d 100.
 

NOT FOR PUBLICATION WITHOUT THE
 
APPROVAL OF THE APPELLATE DIVISION
 

SUPERIOR COURT OF NEW JERSEY
APPELLATE DIVISION
A-3342-97T5
A-3498-97T5

NATHAN R. SCHNITZER,

Plaintiff-Respondent

v.

RUDOLPH F. RINDERER, JR.,
and SANDRA RINDERER,

Defendants-Appellants,

and

CHRISTINE R. DEHNZ, Tax
Collector of Beachwood, and
BOROUGH OF BEACHWOOD,

Defendants-Respondents.
_________________________________

NATHAN SCHNITZER

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

RUDOLPH F. RINDERER, JR.,
and SANDRA RINDERER,

Defendants-Respondents,

and

CHRISTINE R. DEHNZ, Tax
Collector of Beachwood, and
BOROUGH OF BEACHWOOD,

Defendants-Appellants.
__________________________________

Argued: February 3, 1999 - Decided: February 19, 1999

Before Judges King, Wallace and Fall.

On appeal from the Tax Court of New Jersey, whose decision is reported at 17 N.J. Tax 136 (Tax 1998).

Dennis M. Gonski argued the cause for appellants Rudolph F. Rinderer and Sandra Rinderer in A-3342-97T5 and respondents in A-3498-97T5 (Dollinger, Gonski, Grossman, Permut & Hirschhorn, attorneys; Mr. Gonski, on the brief).

Erwin C. Schnitzer argued the cause for respondent Nathan Schnitzer.

Diana L. Anderson argued the cause for respondent in A-3498-97T5 and appellant in A-3342-97T5 Christine R. Dehnz and Borough of Beachwood (Hiering, Hoffman & Gannon, attorneys; Ms. Anderson, of counsel and on the brief).

PER CURIAM

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed for the reason stated by Judge Rimm in his opinion at 17 N.J. Tax 136 (Tax 1998).
Affirmed.

- -