Brown v. Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Bd.

Annotate this Case

101 N.J. Super. 299 (1968)

244 A.2d 310

EVELYN G. BROWN, GUARDIAN AD LITEM FOR PHYLLIS BROWN AND JULIE BROWN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. UNSATISFIED CLAIM AND JUDGMENT FUND BOARD OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, AND JACK E. MEREDITH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued May 27, 1968.

Decided June 11, 1968.

*300 Mr. Howard H. Kestin argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Hoffmann & Humphreys, attorneys).

Mr. Thomas J. Savage, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for defendant Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Board (Mr. Arthur J. Sills, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

Before Judges SULLIVAN, FOLEY and LEONARD.

PER CURIAM.

We are in full agreement with the trial court's ruling, reported at 96 N.J. Super. 91 (Law Div. 1967), that the Unsatisfied Claim and Judgment Fund Law, N.J.S.A. 39:6-61 et seq., does not apply to an accident occurring outside the State of New Jersey, even though the vehicle, the operation of which allegedly caused the accident, was an uninsured automobile registered in this State.

Affirmed.

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.