In re Marriage of Weibert
Annotate this CaseMother and Father divorced in 2012. The parties’ child, B.W., moved with Mother to Washington. Father later filed a motion for modification of the parenting plan requesting primary residential custody of B.W. The parties were able to reach an agreement as to a number of issues. After the district court ruled on the remaining issues, it ordered Father to pay Mother’s attorney’s fees incurred in defending against Father’s motion to amend the parenting plan. The Supreme Court affirmed the award of attorney’s fees and costs, holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering Father to pay Mother’s attorney’s fees.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.