State v. Lee
Annotate this CaseDefendant pleaded nolo contendere to robbery, assault with a weapon, and burglary. The district court sentenced Defendant to prison and imposed numerous conditions on his partially suspended term. In the sentencing order, the district court specified that Defendant’s firearms in the possession of the sheriff were to be sold and applied to the cost of Defendant’s incarceration in a county detention center. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the district court did not have the authority to order the sale of Defendant’s firearms and to apply the proceeds against Defendant’s incarceration costs.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.