State v. Duong
Annotate this CaseDefendant pled no contest to the charge of possession of dangerous drugs with intent to distribute, reserving his right to appeal the denial of his motion to suppress and from the final judgment ordering him to pay the cost of his interpreter and imposing a ten-percent administration fee. The Supreme Court affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded, holding that the district court (1) correctly determined that the arresting officer had particularized suspicion to stop Defendant’s vehicle; (2) erred by ordering Defendant to pay the costs of his interpreter; and (3) erred when it imposed the ten-percent administration fee on Defendant.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.