REESE v MIDLAND EMPIRE PACKING CO

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

No. 80-443 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 1981 ADD REESE, Plaintiff and Respondent, vs. MIDLAND EMPIRE PACKING CO., INC., a Corporation, Defendant and Appellant. Appeal from: District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District, In and for the County of Yellowstone. Honorable Robert Wilson, Judge presiding. Counsel of Record: For Appellant: Berger, Anderson, Sinclair, Murphy, Nelson, Edwards, and Molloy, Billings, Montana For Respondent: Ralph Herriott, Billings, Montana Submitted on briefs: April 2, 1981 Decided: May 20, 1981 Filed : 1R.r 2 0 19fl Clerk J u s t i c e Frank B . M o r r i s o n , J r . , d e l i v e r e d t h e O p i n i o n of t h e Court. Mr. Midland Foods, I n c . , ( s h i p p e r ) a p p e a l s from a judgment of $ 1 4 , 9 6 0 . 1 1 i n f a v o r of Add Reese ( c a r r i e r ) e n t e r e d Septemb e r 11, 1 9 8 0 , i n t h e T h i r t e e n t h J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , Y e l l o w s t o n e County, H o n o r a b l e R o b e r t H . Wilson p r e s i d i n g , f o l l o w i n g a t r i a l o f t h e c o u r t h e l d o n August 1 2 , 1980. W affirm the e t r i a l c o u r t ' s judgment i n f a v o r o f t h e c a r r i e r . T h i s d i s p u t e i n v o l v e s l i a b i l i t y f o r damage t o 1 5 2 boxes of boned b u l l m e a t w e i g h i n g 9,120 pounds. The m e a t was p a r t of a s h i p m e n t t a k e n by t h e c a r r i e r from t h e s h i p p e r ' s dock i.n B i l l i n g s , Montana, and d e l i v e r e d t o Lucky S t o r e s , Buena P a r k , C a l i f o r n i a , i n March o f 1974. The d i s p u t e d 1 5 2 boxes o f b u l l m e a t w e r e r e f u s e d by Lucky S t o r e s when d e l i v e r e d by t h e c a r r i e r . The s h i p p e r d e d u c t e d t h e v a l u e o f t h e r e j e c t e d m e a t from a n open a c c o u n t m a i n t a i n e d w i t h t h e c a r - rier. The c a r r i e r t h e n b r o u g h t t h i s a c t i o n . The i s s u e s on a p p e a l a r e : 1. Whether u n d e r t h e Carmack Amendment, ( l l ) , (49 U.S.C., / / 5'cj 7 r;2&W3j, . 49 U. S C. , § 20 t h e s h i p p e r i s e n t i t l e d t o judgment a s a m a t t e r of law. 2. Whether t h e r e a r e s u f f i c i e n t f a c t s i n t h e r e c o r d t o s u p p o r t t h e f i n d i n g s made by t h e t r i a l c o u r t . The t r i a l c o u r t f o u n d t h a t on March 1 2 , 1974, t h e s h i p p e r ' s employees l o a d e d 30,000 pounds o f f r e s h m e a t i n t o t h e carrier 's refrigerated truck-trailer u n i t for transport to Lucky S t o r e s i n Los A n g e l e s , C a l i f o r n i a . The l o a d e d m e a t came from c a t t l e k i l l e d by t h e s h i p p e r i n i t s p r o c e s s i n g p l a n t a t B i l l i n g s , Montana, and from c a r c a s s e s d e l i v e r e d t o t h e s h i p p e r by C a v i n e s s P a c k i n g Company o f Texas. The c o u r t f u r t h e r found t h a t t h e s h i p p e r ' s employees e x e r c i - s e d exc l u s i v e c o n t r o l of t h e m e a t d u r i n g b o t h t h e b u t c h e r i n g and loading process. C a r r i e r ' s d r i v e r s p i c k e d up t h e r e f r i g - e r a t e d t r a i l e r u n i t af t e r loading. The r e f r i g e r a t e d t r a i l e r u n i t was d e s i g n e d t o h o l d t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e meat c a r g o a t t h e same t e m p e r a t u r e t h e meat was when l o a d e d . was s e t a t 20' F. The t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t The c o o l i n g u n i t would n o t lower t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e c a r g o below t h a t a t which i t was l o a d e d . The c o u r t found t h a t t h e r e f r i g e r a t e d u n i t f u n c t i o n e d p r o p e r l y on t h e h a u l t o Los Angeles. A t t h e time of d e l i v e r y t o Lucky S t o r e s on March 1 4 , 1974, t h e l o a d was i n s p e c t e d by one W h i s l e r , an employee i n s p e c t o r of Lucky S t o r e s . Whisler endorsed upon t h e f r e i g h t b i l l s and b i l l s of l a d i n g , t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e meat, 34O F --50' F , w i t h o u t s p e c i f y i n g t h e p a r t i c u l a r t e m p e r a t u r e of any box i n t h e l o a d . Contrary t o ordinary business p r a c t i c e , Whisler d i d n o t e n d o r s e upon t h e f r e i g h t b i l l s o r b i l l s o f l a d i n g t h e r e a s o n f o r r e j e c t i o n of t h e c a r g o . The c a r r i e r ' s d r i v e r t e s t i f i e d t h a t Whisler r e j e c t e d t h e meat b e c a u s e "he t h o u g h t t h e meat had been loaded f r o z e n and i t was i n a thawing p r o c e s s when I d e l i v e r e d i t . " The f r o s t e d meat was i n boxes on t h e f l o o r of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t . of t h e r e j e c t i o n , After learning t h e s h i p p e r d i r e c t e d t h a t t h e meat be t a k e n t o P a c i f i c Cold S t o r a g e , where' i t was - f r o z e n . The s h i p p e r ' s meat b r o k e r l a t e r checked t h e l o a d i n s t o r a g e and a d v i s e d t h e s h i p p e r t h a t t h e l o a d was r e j e c t e d b e c a u s e i t was " o f f o d o r " . The s h i p p e r c o n t e n d s t h r o u g h o u t t h e c a s e t h a t " o f f o d o r " was t h e b a s i s f o r r e j e c t i o n . The t r i a l c o u r t d i d n o t make a f i n d i n g r e s p e c t i n g t h e r e a s o n f o r Lucky S t o r e s r e j e c t i n g t h e l o a d . P u r s u a n t t o d i r e c t i o n from t h e s h i p p e r , t h e c a r r i e r r e t u r n e d t h e meat t o t h e s h i p p e r i n a t r a i l e r u n i t c a r r y i n g vegetables. The t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t , w h i l e h a u l i n g v e g e t a b l e s , was h e l d a t 38O F , which would n o t p r e v e n t t h e f r o z e n meat from thawing. t o the shipper. T h i s f a c t was known When t h e meat a r r i v e d i n B i l l i n g s , i t was "soggy", and blood was r u n n i n g o u t of t h e boxes. The meat was e v e n t u a l l y s u b m i t t e d t o a r e n d e r i n g p r o c e s s by t h e s h i p p e r and s o l d f o r animal consumption. The t r i a l c o u r t found t h a t t h e c a r r i e r ' s r e f r i g e r a t e d t r a i l e r u n i t functioned properly a t a l l times. This finding w a s premised upon t h e f a c t t h a t t h e equipment was new and upon t h e d r i v e r ' s t e s t i m o n y t h a t p e r i o d i c c h e c k s of t h e l o a d were made d u r i n g t r a n s p o r t . L i a b i l i t y f o r damage t o i n t e r s t a t e shipments i s governed by t h e Carmack Amendment, 49 U.S . C . , 4 9 U.S.C., 5 2 0 (1) r e e n a c t e d a s , 811707, w i t h o u t s u b s t a n t i v e change. This s t a t u t e c o d i f i e s t h e common-law r u l e t h a t a c a r r i e r , though n o t a n a b s o l u t e i n s u r e r , i s l i a b l e f o r damage u n l e s s t h e damage i s c a u s e d by: (1) a n a c t of God, a c t of t h e s h i p p e r , ( 2 ) t h e p u b l i c enemy, ( 4 ) a public authority, o r , i n h e r e n t v i c e o r n a t u r e of t h e goods. (5) the Missouri P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d v . Elmore & S t a h l ( 1 9 6 4 ) , 377 U.S. 1142, 1145, 1 2 L.Ed.2d (3) the 134, 1 3 8 , 84 S.Ct. 194. For t h e s h i p p e r t o e s t a b l i s h a prima f a c i e c a s e , i t must show t h a t t h e meat was d e l i v e r e d t o t h e c a r r i e r i n good c o n d i t i o n and a r r i v e d i n a damaged c o n d i t i o n . t h e n on t h e c a r r i e r t o show: The burden i s (1) freedom from n e g l i g e n c e and ( 2 ) a p p l i c a b i l i t y of a t l e a s t one of t h e enumerated e x c e p t i o n s . Missouri P a c i f i c Railroad. The c a r r i e r ' s c a s e r e s t s upon a d e s c r i p t i o n of i t s equipment and t e s t i m o n y by t h e d r i v e r t h a t t h e u n i t f u n c t i o n e d properly throughout t h e t r i p . The s h i p p e r ' s c a s e i s t h a t t h e meat was d e l i v e r e d i n good c o n d i t i o n a n d , t h e r e f o r e , must have d e t e r i o r a t e d d u r i n g t h e h a u l . W e have c a r e f u l l y reviewed t h e r e c o r d t o d e t e r m i n e i f t h e r e i s s u b s t a n t i a l c r e d i b l e e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t t h e judgment e n t e r e d by t h e t r i a l court. The r e c o r d i s n o t c l e a r on whether t h e meat was r e j e c t e d by Lucky S t o r e s b e c a u s e i t was thawing o r b e c a u s e t h e m e a t was " o f f o d o r " . There i s e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t e a c h . The s t r o n g e s t e v i d e n c e s u p p o r t i n g t h e p o s i t i o n of t h e s h i p p e r t h a t t h e c o n d i t i o n of t h e meat changed d u r i n g t h e p e r i o d o f t r a n s p o r t a t i o n , comes from two s o u r c e s . First, a l l of t h e meat t h a t was r e j e c t e d was on t h e bottom of t h e t r a i l e r unit. The r e c o r d i s devoid of e v i d e n c e from t h e s h i p p e r ' s employees r e g a r d i n g how t h e boxes of meat were stacked p r i o r t o being loaded i n t h e t r a i l e r u n i t . Never- t h e l e s s , assuming t h e t r a i l e r was l o a d e d from f r o n t t o back, t h e s h i p p e r can a r g u e t h a t a l l of t h e meat found t o be i n a "thawing p r o c e s s " would n o t have been on t h e bottom of t h e t r a i l e r u n i t u n l e s s t h e c o n d i t i o n of t h e meat changed a f t e r i t was l o a d e d . The s h i p p e r ' s p o s i t i o n a l s o f i n d s some s u p p o r t i n t h e f a c t t h a t , i f t h e t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e t r a i l e r was h e l d a t 2 0 ° F t h r o u g h o u t t h e t r i p , t h e meat would n o t have been i n a "thawing p r o c e s s " , a t t h e time i t was d e l i v e r e d t o Lucky Stores. Again, t h e r e c o r d i s devoid of e v i d e n c e r e g a r d i n g whether f r o z e n meat would thaw a t a t e m p e r a t u r e of 20' F. However, i f t h e r e i s s u b s t a n t i a l c r e d i b l e e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t t h e t r i a l c o u r t ' s d e c i s i o n i n f a v o r of t h e c a r r i e r , we must a f f i r m . W e f i n d such evidence t o e x i s t . The t e m p e r a t u r e of t h e meat a t t h e t i m e of d e l i v e r y t o Lucky S t o r e s ranged from 34' F t o 50' c l o s e s the reason f o r t h i s v a r i a t i o n . F. The r e c o r d d i s - The s h i p p e r f i n i s h e d boning p a r t of t h e b u l l meat on Monday, March 11, and t h e remainder on Tuesday, March 1 2 . The meat was s h i p p e d on March 12. The meat which was boned on Monday was p u t i n t o a freezer a t -lo0 F u n t i l i t was l o a d e d Tuesday. The meat t h a t was boned on Tuesday was b e i n g p r o c e s s e d i n a room where t h e t e m p e r a t u r e v a r i e d from 32' F t o 50' F. I t was n o t s u b j e c t e d t o f r e e z i n g t e m p e r a t u r e s and was l o a d e d a f t e r i t was boned on Tuesday. These f a c t s a c c o u n t f o r t h e wide v a r i a t i o n i n meat t e m p e r a t u r e found a t t h e Lucky S t o r e s . Whether t h e meat was r e j e c t e d b e c a u s e i t was warm and " o f f odor" o r b e c a u s e i t was "thawing" t h e r e c o r d can i n f e r e n t i a l l y s u p p o r t t h e meat b e i n g l o a d e d by t h e s h i p p e r i n t h e same c o n d i t i o n i t was found t o be i n when examined a t Lucky S t o r e s . W e must a f f i r m t h e t r i a l c o u r t i f t h e r e i s any s u b s t a n t i a l c r e d i b l e e v i d e n c e t o s u p p o r t i t s judgment. Rule 52, M.R.Civ.P. Under t h e Carmack Amendment, t h e carrier had t h e burden of p r o v i n g t h a t t h e s h i p p e r was r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e l o s s . The c a r r i e r met t h a t burden by p r o v i n g t h a t t h e equipment d i d n o t malfunction during the t r i p , thereby c r e a t i n g an i n f e r e n c e of damage o c c u r r i n g p r i o r t o t h e h a u l . Although t h e s h i p p e r ' s t e s t i m o n y a t t e m p t e d t o p r o v e t h a t t h e meat was i n an a c c e p t a b l e c o n d i t i o n when i t was l o a d e d , t h e r e i s e v i d e n c e i n t h e r e c o r d from which t h e t r i a l c o u r t c o u l d f i n d t h a t t h e meat r e j e c t e d by Lucky S t o r e s was i n t h a t same c o n d i t i o n when l o a d e d by t h e s h i p p e r . Therefore, t h e shipper's c o n d u c t i n h a n d l i n g t h e meat l e d t o t h e r e j e c t i o n . Although w e might have d e c i d e d t h e c a s e d i f f e r e n t l y had w e been t h e t r i e r o f - f a c t , t h e r e i s s u f f i c i e n t evidence i n t h e record t o s u p p o r t t h e f i n d i n g s made by t h e t r i a l c o u r t . The judgment i s a f f i r m e d . We concur:

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.