State of Missouri, Respondent, v. George W. Carlisle, Jr., Appellant.
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FIVE STATE OF MISSOURI, Plaintiff/Respondent, vs. GEORGE W. CARLISLE, JR., Defendant/Appellant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. ED92749 Appeal from the Circuit Court of St. Charles County Hon. Ted House FILED: May 12, 2009 George W. Carlisle, Jr. (Appellant) appeals from an order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis in his criminal proceeding. His criminal case is still pending in the trial court. This Court issued an order directing Appellant to show cause why his appeal should not be dismissed for lack of a final, appealable judgment. Appellant has filed a response to the order. Appellant is appealing from an order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and his criminal case is still pending in the trial court. Appellant has not been convicted and no judgment and sentence have been entered. Thus, there is no right to an appeal under section 547.070, RSMo 2000. State v. Welch, 865 S.W.2d 434, 435 (Mo. App. E.D. 1993). Appellant asserts in his response that the denial of indigent status violates his constitutional rights. In essence, Appellant argues only the merits of his appeal. He does not assert there is a final, appealable judgment. Appellant's review, if any, is by extraordinary writ petition. See, Wray v. Adams, 103 S.W.3d 812, 813 (Mo. App. E.D. 2003). The appeal is dismissed without prejudice for lack of a final, appealable judgment. __________________________________ NANNETTE A. BAKER, CHIEF JUDGE PATRICIA L. COHEN, J. and KENNETH M. ROMINES, J., concur. 2
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
