Robbie K. Asher v. The Mississippi Bar
Annotate this Case
Download PDF
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI
NO. 1998-BR-01367-SCT
RE: PETITION OF ROBBIE KIRK ASHER FOR REINSTATEMENT TO THE
PRIVILEGE OF PRACTICING LAW IN THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT:
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE:
NATURE OF THE CASE:
DISPOSITION:
MOTION FOR REHEARING FILED:
MANDATE ISSUED:
9/21/95
PRO SE
MICHAEL B. MARTZ
CIVIL - BAR MATTERS
REINSTATEMENT DENIED - 3/4/99
EN BANC.
PITTMAN, PRESIDING JUSTICE, FOR THE COURT:
¶1. This matter came before the Court en banc on a Petition for Reinstatement by Robbie Kirk Asher
(Asher) seeking reinstatement into the Mississippi Bar. Reinstatement into the Bar is governed by Rule 12
of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline. The Bar has filed an Answer to the Petition for Reinstatement of
Asher and has submitted copies of the Ruling of the Complaint Tribunal, the deposition of Asher, a copy of
Asher's Application for a Real Estate Broker's License, a copy of the Opinion and Judgment of the
Complaint Tribunal in the matter styled Mississippi Bar v. Robbie K. Asher, No. 95-B-329, by virtue of
which Asher was suspended from the practice of law in the State of Mississippi for a period of sixty days to
run consecutively with the suspension from the practice of law imposed upon Asher by this Court in cause
number 94-BA-00324-SCT. This Court also recognizes that Asher has recently petitioned this Court for
Reinstatement in cause number 98-BR-00191-SCT which was denied in an order signed by Justice James
L. Roberts, Jr.
¶2. After carefully reviewing the Petition for Reinstatement and the Answer to that Petition, we deny
Asher's Petition for Reinstatement. We agree with the Bar that serious concerns remain as to whether Asher
possesses the requisite legal ability as well as the requisite moral character to be reinstated into the practice
of law in the State of Mississippi.
¶3. We base that concern in part on the fact that approximately four months after Asher was suspended
from the practice of law for misrepresentation, deceit, fraud and forgery, he made a misrepresentation on his
Application for Real Estate Broker's License. To the question as to whether he had ever had a license
suspended or revoked, he incorrectly answered in the negative. Further, we have been provided with no
documentation from Asher as to his compliance with Rule 12.5 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline which
requires that he take and successfully pass the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Examination with a
score of not less than 80.
¶4. On several other occasions Asher has ignored rulings adverse to his interests. Asher was assessed with
costs and expenses in the total amount of $490.86 which he neglected to pay until almost two years after
the assessment. This assessment was the result of Cause No. 94-BA-324 and Cause No. 95-B-329.
¶5. Asher failed to include any mention of Cause No. 95-B-329 in the present Petition for Reinstatement.
In addition to being assessed with costs and expenses in this action, Asher was required to apologize, in
writing, to the Bar and Tribunal for an unnecessary hearing. The Bar, apparently, never received said
apology. Asher has engaged in reprehensible conduct for which he seems to have little or no remorse.
¶6. Under the facts of this case, we deem it proper that Asher continue to be suspended from the practice
of law in the State of Mississippi for a period of not less than one year; that he be reinstated to practice only
upon petition under the provisions of Rule 12 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline; and that prior to
reinstatement he take the Multi-State Professional Responsibility Examination and achieve a score as
provided in Rule 12.5 of the Mississippi Rules of Discipline.
¶7. ROBBIE KIRK ASHER'S PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT TO PRACTICE LAW IN
THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DENIED. HIS SUSPENSION IS TO CONTINUE FOR A
PERIOD OF NOT LESS THAN ONE YEAR, AND HE SHALL BE READMITTED ONLY
UPON PETITION IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 12 OF THE MISSISSIPPI RULES OF
DISCIPLINE WHICH INCLUDE PASSING THE MULTI-STATE PROFESSIONAL
RESPONSIBILITY EXAMINATION WITH A SCORE AS PROVIDED IN RULE 12.5. ALL
COSTS AND EXPENSES ARE ASSESSED TO ROBBIE KIRK ASHER.
PRATHER, C.J., SULLIVAN, P.J., BANKS, McRAE, SMITH, MILLS AND WALLER, JJ.,
CONCUR.
Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
