Wendy C. Ruby, Respondent, vs. Casey's General Store, Inc., and CCMSI, Relators, and Injured Workers' Pharmacy, Intervenor.

Annotate this Case

Download PDF

STATE OF MINNESOTA September 28, 2011 IN SUPREME COURT A11-0964 Wendy C. Ruby, Respondent, vs. Casey s General Store, Inc., and CCMSI, Relators, and Injured Workers Pharmacy, Intervenor. ________________________________ DeAnna M. McCashin, Schoep & McCashin, Chtd., Alexandria, Minnesota, for respondent. Timothy S. Crom, Matthew P. Bandt, Jardine, Logan & O Brien, P.L.L.P., Lake Elmo, Minnesota, for relator. _______________________________ Considered and decided by the court without oral argument. 1 ORDER Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers Compensation Court of Appeals filed April 29, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case). Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees. Dated: September 28, 2011 BY THE COURT: /s/ David R. Stras Associate Justice 2

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.