List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 30, 2007

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED May 30, 2007 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
May 30, 2007

1. Ralph E. Sletten, et al. v. Composting Concepts, Inc., et al. A06-2372 Denied 2. Gordon Grannes, et al. v. red cedar of Yellow Medicine, Inc. A06-595 Denied 3. State v. Scott William Nace A06-216 Denied 4. State v. Clayton Bellanger A04-1790 Denied 5. State v. Robert Patrick Hill A06-371 Denied 6. State v. Terrence Davone Olive A06-206 Denied 7. State v. David Royster A05-2325 Denied 8. State v. Kevin Donald Turck A06-846 Denied 9. In the Matter of the Application of: LeMoyne Dio Jones for Change of Name A07-337 Denied 10. In re State of Minnesota, Petitioner. In re the Marriage of: Christina M. Deal v. Ryan S. Deal A07-278 Granted 11. Michelle Lynne Anderson v. State A06-770 Denied 12. Kristin Joan Knutson v. Commissioner of Public Safety A06-745 Denied 13. State v. Brandon Cain Simonson A05-2458 Denied 14. In re the Custody of C.F.: L.F. and S.F. v. K.K.C. A07-308 Denied 15. In the Matter of the Petition of Option One Mortgage Corporation, Regarding Certificate of Title No. 1110609 or the Current Certificate A06-764 Denied 16. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Byron Kenneth Anderson A06-2008 Denied 17. State v. Michael Jon Bailey A05-2107 Denied 18. In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Raymond Leon Semler A06-2213 Denied 19. Wayne Nicolaison v. Cal Ludeman, Commissioner of Human Services - A06-1969 Denied 20. State v. Domingo Delarosa A05-431 Stay Vacated/Denied 21. In the Matter of the Welfare of: T.L.S. and T.J.W., Parents A06-1835 Denied 22. In re K.S.A. and A.F.M., Petitioners. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K.A. and A.M., Parents - A07-637 Denied In re J.L.V. and S.E.L., Petitioners. In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J.L.V. and S.E.L., Parents - A07-638 Denied

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.