Tamara Joan Haeg, Respondent, vs. SEKO Worldwide d/b/a Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm

Tamara Joan Haeg, Respondent, vs. SEKO Worldwide d/b/a Vast Logistics, Relator, and Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm'd by Berkley Risk Administrators, Respondent, and Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology, North Memorial Ambulance Service, and Twin City Anesthesia Associates, Intervenors. A07-258, Supreme Court Order, June 7, 2007.

STATE OF MINNESOTA

IN SUPREME COURT

A07-258

 

 

Tamara Joan Haeg,               

 

                                    Respondent,

 

vs.

 

SEKO Worldwide d/b/a Vast Logistics,     

 

                                                Relator,                     

                                   

and

 

Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan, adm'd                   

by Berkley Risk Administrators,                            

 

                                                Respondent,              

 

and

 

Regions Hospital, St. Paul Radiology,

North Memorial Ambulance Service, and

Twin City Anesthesia Associates,

 

                                                Intervenors.

 

            Considered and decided by the court en banc.

 

O R D E R

 

            Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

            IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals filed January 4, 2007, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion.  See Hoff v. Kempton,317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that "[s]ummary affirmances have no precedential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," doing no more than establishing the law of the case). 

            Dated:  May 30, 2007

 

 

 

                                                                                    BY THE COURT:

 

 

 

    /s/                                                         

 

Sam Hanson

Associate Justice