List of ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED November 15

Annotate this Case
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED November 15, 2005 Minnesota Supreme Court
ORDERS ON PETITIONS FOR FURTHER REVIEW FILED
November 15, 2005

1.    State v. Elliot B. Holly A04-1496 Denied 2.    State v. Kerry Lee Heyer A04-1729 Denied 3.    Roberto Orta-Castillo v. State A04-2428 Denied 4.    State v. John Patrick Murphy A04-2367 Denied 5.    State v. Marco Antonio Lopez A05-63 Denied 6.    State v. Jesus Antonio Estrella A05-43 Denied 7.    State v. Philander Dermont Jenkins A05-68 Denied 8.    State v. Paul J. Wrobleski A04-1493 Denied 9.    State v. Edgar John Hardwick A04-1386 Denied 10.  State v. Samuel James Anderson A04-1413 Denied 11.  Marie Ann Prom v. Michael James Prom A04-2430 Denied 12.  Reginald Sweet v. Commissioner of Human Services A04-2274 Denied 13.  State v. Zachary Shane Fitzgerald A04-1836 Denied 14.  State v. Oscar D. Navarro A04-1791 Denied 15.  State v. Curtis Lee Frederickson A04-2061 Denied 16.  Nancy C. Lazaryan, Evelyn C. Wallace v. Judge Marrinan of the Ramsey County District Court in her Capacity Personally, Ronald Riach A05-28 Denied 17.  Cassandra J. Jenkins v. American Express Financial Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development A04-2308 Granted 18.  Hans Kranz, et al. v. Township of Mantrap, County of Hubbard, Minnesota A05-323 Denied 19.  Pedro Charles Flores v. State A04-2488 Denied 20.  Charles Patrick Jones v. State A04-2267 Denied 21.  In the Matter of the Welfare of C.L.W., Child A04-2059 Denied 22.  In the Matter of the Medical License of Roger J. Day, M.D., License Number: 33984 A05-1575 Denied 23.  State v. Larry Larue Clark, Ronald Lindsey Reed A05-1827 Denied 24.  State v. Larry Larue Clark, Ronald Lindsey Reed A05-1835 Denied 25.  Bruce Bolander, individually and as trustee of the David C. Bolander 1994 Irrevocable Trust v. David Bolander, et al. A04-2003, A04-2031 and A04-2117 Dismissed (Order Filed 10-28-05)

Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can produce inaccuracies. You should read the full case before relying on it for legal research purposes.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.